AcqualyticsAcqualytics
Assurance · Transition risk model

What leaving would take

Four scenarios, each with its risk level and timeline — turning a dead end into a decision you can weigh. Full transition is estimated at 8–14 months.

Vendor leaves, no handoff

Critical
Rebuild / transition
14 mo

Catastrophic: the backend can't be updated without the vantage/* packages and infrastructure knowledge is lost. Northwind would have to negotiate source access and repo transfer — or rebuild.

Vendor leaves, full source handoff

High
Time to productive
12 mo

A 6–12 month learning curve: Northwind must set up private package hosting and recreate CI/CD, with no tests to validate changes along the way.

Add a second developer alongside the vendor

Moderate
Time to productive
6 mo

Steep onboarding (3–6 months to productive) — the CLAUDE.md docs target AI, not humans, and infrastructure is undocumented. Builds resilience while the system runs.

Vendor continues, add oversight (recommended)

Low
Time to productive
5 mo

Lowest risk first step: don't replace the vendor — verify Northwind can. Embed a QA engineer and the build checklist answers, within 30 days, whether Northwind could operate independently.